I borrowed this from another site, which got it from Oxford encyclopedia/dictionary.
linear, a. and n.
Add: [A.][3.]c. Of causation, evolution, time, etc.: progressing in a single direction by regular steps or stages, sequential.
- 1948 E. WHITTAKER Space & Spirit xxxix. 126 In the argument as usually presented..all chains of causation are simple linear sequences.
- 1954 A. P. USHER Hist. Mech. Inventions (ed. 2) ii. 30 The cultures of antiquity do not fit the patterns of the linear sequences of social and economic evolution developed by the German Historical Schools.
- 1972 R. D. WALSHE in G. W. Turner Good Austral. Eng. xi. 228 The McLuhan thesis that..‘linear thinking’..had been rendered obsolete by the new ‘in-depth’, ‘all-at-once’ thinking of the electronic media.
- 1979 P. MATTHIESSEN Snow Leopard i. 60 The Australian aborigines..distinguish between linear time and a ‘Great Time’ of dreams, myths, and heroes, in which all is present in this moment.
- 1983 P. LIVELY Perfect Happiness viii. 112 Time, that should be linear, had become formless.
- 1992 Forum Mod. Lang. Stud. Jan. 22 It is impossible to over-emphasise the importance of the poet's decision to keep the inexorable linear flow of time intact on each occasion when a-temporally is alluded to."
Now with this all out in the open, let me explain quantum idea. The idea where all points are tied to each other point. Thinking in quantum allows one to think of all possibilities of a situation rather quickly by accessing parts of the mind quicker than the process of sequenced thought.
Most of peoples mind work in a process of 1 then 2 then 3. where quantum thought starts and ends with 1, but in 1 it also holds 2 3 and on. How is this possible? The mind is a computer they say right, but it is more than just your average x86 or Risc computer. It is actually a quantum computer. Like today we have technology far better than we use, but the capital of making such machines is too costly at the time, so we wait years after it's development so it can be cost effective.
Generally this is how most people think. They think far below their potential. In fact humanity lives far below it's potential, thinks below it's potential, and acts far far below it's potential.
The statement, walk away because nothing is worth fighting for spawns the following from the linear thought form.
Sure things are worth fighting for. x life is worth fighting for, or y idea is worth fighting for.
Quantum thought tries to calculate every possibility and determines the best outcome for all. If x is protected, then z who was trying to kill x is killed. That spawns w to kills x and which will start an endless cycle of blood. So no life is really worth fighting for. Not in the aspects one uses fight in today terms.
Besides there are many ways to accomplish the same thing without the loss of life. The art of war states that a battle is only truly one if no life is lost. Using spies, having the enemy struggle within upon their choices. To win the battle without fighting is much better way to accomplish something.
Unlike the majority of people out there that talk without realizing what exactly they say, it is not their fault thought. It is more society brain washing. It is however the fault of a person not to question society, to lead life according to what the news stations say, or the magazines, TV, even computer says how you should live and think.
I say there is emotion is useless, and well it is in certain aspects. When searching for truth emotion can cloud judgements and calculations, also it can form bias standings, which get in the way of calculated and proven truths. The emotions of the people of earth was that it was flat, so people did not sail to the edge of the world. The emotions of falling off kept them from calculating the truth fully. So yes feelings in a degree are useless, but in other aspects such as the arts, emotions are priceless.
In my life they are more worthless on a daily basis than what others think they are, but I still feed my emotions and let them out to play when I write. When dealing with people the well the more closed in the emotions the more truth and the more resolutions can appear to happen. I would rather not have emotions involved in dealing with people so I can focus on their emotional give a ways.
My path in life encompasses those parts of the soul, inner being that others try to carve out of themselves. Which may make me seem heartless, cold, evil, or murderous. But at least I am a whole person. Yes I lead life in a very monk type way, but it does not mean I cut out the side of my inner being that loves to harm and hurt. I humour the thought, but redirect it at the same time to a positive manner. When I talk about my darker side, it may seem disturbing, or un-sage worthy, but trust me, at least when I die, I will be a whole person that enjoyed the journey and the death all the way to the end. Why? Because I lived according to my path, my Dao and not anyone else.
Do I care what people think of me? No. I really don't. If they like me or hate me, it is their opinion. Since I was young I thought outside the normal, since I was young I did not fit in but yet somehow did. The Dao state if you have one thing you will find the complete opposite as well regardless of what you do it will eventually happen. So here is a thought, if you try to totally get rid of hate, greed, anger, and destruction, what else are you truly giving up? The opposites of such emotions. You hide them, you can't get rid of them. Then you claim you love xyz or your not angry, or your not greedy, all the time such humbling actions are untrue.
Only a person that has come to terms with such emotions can control such emotions. Do I feel bad about anything in life? No not really, I have come to a calm spot though sometimes dark, or cold but it still is comfortable and natural for me. Why should I fight when I can walk away. Just because someone wants to put a roadblock up in front of me I will just flow with the water and go in a different direction. In the end the water will be there however what use is a damn if the water is taken a way?
There are so many calculations that one can do for death. Bottom line though is it will happen if you fight or not, it is part of the cycle. If you fight you use energy for a cause that in a few years really won't matter anyway. Picking your battles? Na, if you want the water to flow a different way, build a canal, not a damn.
Only linear thought thinks the only way to force water is to build a damn, if that is not option then go to a canal. Better yet relocate the water and it's source and you do not have to waste energy in building something, plus you provide the water to an area that needs it more. Oh what wait, that is not in a sequence. Here is another idea, compress it, slow it to a bare crawl on a molecular level, if atoms of water do not move, then the water will not move.
all viable options on how to manipulate a situation without building a damn. In other words all ways to handle a situation without a fight, or at least a full energy fight. Use the weight and energy of the opposing force against itself.
Most of civilization and I use the term loosely, will willingly immediately try to fight and claim it is survival instinct. The animals and creatures that survive is not only using instinct, but calculated moves, with a cool head. Survival instincts coming from a linear thought person is nothing but words spewing out. The first thing they do in a crisis is panic.
Quantum thinkers, instantly have at least 5 plans for an exit strategy, and stipulations to issues that may come up. These are the true survival instincts of nature. Rely on emotions and more than likely you will not survive, rely on calculated, and planned logic and the odds greatly improve.
A sage has full control of the emotions, but it does not mean they lack the darker side, it means they accepted that side and chose to redirect it for the highest benefit of others. A sage that lacked the animal inside or portions of that animal was no sage at all, but a religious (with the rules that tame all others) leader.
Religion is a virus to me. Pick a religion any. Then ask a question that brings that religion into a darker light or leads to a logical reason why it should not be and the priest gets upset. Why because the religion is set up based on faith with the inability to question things. It has golden rules that one is supposed to follow that helps priest become rich, or control people. In my deepest thought, religion is the majority source of all problems in the world. The biggest contributor to a social deterioration of values, and more and more blood in the world.
People who would start to try to develop quantum thought instead of linear would be so much quicker in finding answers, because they are not afraid to think in all directions at once, and yet still keep all thoughts separated, or link them all together for an answer.
See the brain is capable of multi-threading and multi-tasking. The body however is not so much. There is a delay in the hands, and eyes. But if calculating theory, thoughts, ideas, close the eyes, calm the body and let the mind free of restraint and soon you will find that circles and patterns, and multiple thoughts running at once with ease you keep up to them. I think the sages of old were also quantum thinkers as well, and not so much as linear thinkers.
I will leave you at that point to think upon. All things seem different in this blog tonight but all things relate.
No comments:
Post a Comment